Pro · Case Canvas
Every claim,
mapped to its proof.
An interactive graph connects each criterion to the evidence behind it, with evidence-strength badges applied consistently everywhere in the product — and gap detection that catches what's missing before an officer does.
Start your trialEvery claim connected to its proof, a single point of failure pulsing red.
What the graph shows.
One graph, every criterion to its proof.
Criteria, claims, and evidence connect in one interactive graph — architect's-pen curves, not a tangle of straight lines, with a single point of failure pulsing red the moment one claim depends on exactly one unverified source.
See the gaps in your evidence chronology.
The same exhibits laid out along a real timeline instead of a graph — a highlighted gap band shows exactly how long it's been since a criterion's most recent evidence, the kind of hole a graph view alone won't surface.
Share the graph, not platform access.
Generate a read-only share link and your attorney opens the exact same graph with an Attorney View badge — no account, no login, no platform access required on their end.
A list of exhibits doesn't show you what's actually connected.
A claim can rest on exactly one source.
A petition can read as well-documented while one of its central claims depends on a single, unverified exhibit — invisible in a document list, obvious in a graph.
A strong exhibit set can still be stale.
Twelve exhibits can look thorough while the most recent one supporting a given criterion is over a year old — a document list alone won't show you when.
Sharing your case with your attorney shouldn't need a login.
Exporting a static PDF loses the interactivity; giving full platform access is more than most attorneys want. Neither is a real answer.
Why a chatbot can't map your case.
A guess and a graded, evidence-linked map are not the same kind of answer.
A chatbot has no concept of a claim graph.
General-purpose AI reasons over the text you paste in — it has no structural model connecting a claim to the specific exhibit that supports it, so it can't tell you where that connection is missing.
It can't see a single point of failure.
Spotting that one claim depends on exactly one unverified source requires tracking claim-to-evidence relationships explicitly — a conversation doesn't do that by default.
It has no sense of your evidence's age.
Without a real chronology, "you have strong evidence" can't distinguish a criterion supported by last month's letter from one resting on a source from three years ago.
See the claim that rests on one unverified source.
How the canvas builds.
The graph builds from your Case File.
Criteria, claims, and evidence populate automatically from the same structured Case File every Merito tool reads — no separate setup.
A single point of failure pulses red.
Any claim resting on exactly one unverified source gets flagged visually, in the graph itself, not buried in a report.
Switch to the timeline to see the gaps.
The same evidence, laid out chronologically — a gap band shows exactly how long it's been since a criterion's most recent supporting exhibit.
Share a read-only link with your attorney.
No account required on their end — they open the link and see the exact same graph, marked as Attorney View.
LIVE CASE MAP — NOT A FILED DOCUMENT
Map your case before an officer does.
Start your trial