Skip to content

Pro · Expert Finder

Real researchers who
already know your work.

Expert Finder searches the researchers who cited your work, deterministically excludes co-authors and shared-institution researchers, and ranks who's left by citing engagement — real candidates for an independent support letter, not a cold-call list.

Start your trial
01/03The check

Co-authors and shared-institution researchers, excluded automatically.

01

What gets verified.

01

Independence is checked, not assumed.

Self-citations, shared authorship with the petitioner, and same-current-institution researchers are excluded deterministically — what's left has a real, checkable basis for independence.

Excludes co-authorsExcludes shared institutionDeterministic, not AI-guessed
02

Ranked by real citing engagement.

Candidates are ranked by how many of your works they actually cited, then by their own publication record — real institution, real h-index, real citing-work count.

Real institutionReal h-indexRanked by engagement
03

One click into Expert Letter Studio.

A candidate's "Start letter" button flows straight into Expert Letter Studio with their independence basis attached — no dead-end contact list to work from alone.

Direct handoffIndependence basis attachedNo dead end
02

A cold-call list of "experts" wastes everyone's time.

FiledDay 1
Receipt noticeMonth 1
No updateMonth 3
No updateMonth 6
No updateMonth 9
RFE issuedMonth 10

A co-author isn't an independent witness.

Recommending a frequent collaborator as an "independent" expert is exactly the kind of shortcut that invites scrutiny.

Manually checking every citing author's history doesn't scale.

Verifying that a candidate never co-authored with you or shared your institution means digging through publication records one name at a time.

A list of names isn't a plan.

Finding a candidate is only half the problem — without a drafting starting point, the list just sits there.

03

Why a chatbot can't find you an independent expert.

A plausible-sounding name is not the same as a checked one.

It has no real citation graph to search.

General-purpose AI doesn't have access to a live, queryable record of who actually cited your specific work — it can only guess at plausible-sounding names.

It can't run a real independence check.

Determining co-authorship and shared-institution overlap requires structured data lookups, not a language model's best guess.

It stops at a name, not a next step.

Even a correct name is just a dead end without a drafting starting point that carries the independence basis forward.

Real citations. Checked independence. One click to draft.

04

How a search runs.

01

Your author record is matched.

Your name or ORCID is matched to your real publication and citation record.

02

Independence is checked automatically.

Self-citations, co-authors, and same-current-institution researchers are excluded deterministically.

03

Remaining candidates are ranked.

By citing engagement first, then their own publication record — real institution, real h-index.

04

Start a letter in one click.

A candidate's independence basis flows straight into Expert Letter Studio as a drafting starting point.

INDEPENDENCE, CHECKED NOT ASSUMED

Start your trial

Find who already knows your work.

Start your trial
Expert Finder — Merito