Pro · Evidence Binder
Every exhibit, organized
before your attorney asks.
Your evidence, organized criterion by criterion with flat, sequential exhibit numbers and an archive appendix — computed entirely from your already-graded Case File. No AI call, no credit cost, just the record laid out clearly.
Start your trialFlat, sequential numbers — deterministic, never renumbered by hand.
What gets organized.
Flat, sequential exhibit numbers.
Evidence is walked criterion by criterion, strongest first, and numbered once across the whole case — a shared item linked to two criteria keeps the one number it was first assigned, never renumbered.
Coverage at a glance.
Every criterion shows its real evidence strength — the same strong/moderate/weak/gap language used identically across Case Canvas, Radar, and Merito Audit.
An archive appendix, built in.
Every source-cited exhibit pairs its original URL with its Wayback-archived copy — a link going dead after filing doesn't cost you the exhibit.
A strong record, scattered across forty files, isn't a binder.
No exhibit numbers until the very end.
Attorneys renumber exhibits by hand from a folder of loose files — tedious, error-prone, and redone every time evidence changes.
No criterion-by-criterion view of what's covered.
Without organizing evidence by criterion first, gaps stay invisible until an officer — or an RFE — finds them.
Source URLs quietly go dead.
A news article or company blog post cited as evidence can disappear months before filing, with no record of what it said.
Why a folder of PDFs isn't a binder.
Organization is a deterministic problem — it doesn't need a model, it needs the right structure applied consistently.
A file explorer doesn't know your criteria.
Generic file organization tools have no concept of EB-1A/O-1A criteria, evidence strength, or exhibit sequencing — you're still doing the mapping by hand.
Nothing else pairs the archive with the exhibit.
A plain folder of PDFs has no idea which sources were ever fetched from the live web, let alone whether they're still there.
Manual renumbering doesn't scale with revisions.
Every time evidence is added or reordered, hand-numbered exhibits have to be redone from scratch — the Binder recomputes instantly instead.
Your evidence, organized — computed, not typed.
How the Binder builds itself.
Reads your already-graded Case File.
No new upload, no re-entry — the Binder reads the same structured evidence Case Canvas and Merito Score already use.
Organizes by criterion, numbers by strength.
Strongest evidence first within each criterion, flat sequential numbers across the whole case.
Review by criterion or by document.
Two views over the same data — whichever way your attorney thinks about the file.
Export a real Binder PDF.
Cover, per-criterion sections, exhibit index, and the archive appendix — ready to hand off.
ZERO AI CALLS · ZERO CREDIT COST
Stop renumbering exhibits by hand.
Start your trial