What actually happens when you run the Officer Simulator on your own file

Sharing this because I went in expecting something closer to a chatbot Q&A and it wasn't that — it's closer to reading commentary written by someone genuinely working through your case file section by section, criterion by criterion, the way a reviewer actually would. A few things that were more useful than I expected: - Seeing exactly where the commentary paused to flag something unclear, rather than a generic "this section could be stronger" note - The split view keeping the actual document next to the commentary made it obvious which specific sentence or exhibit a given comment was about, instead of vague overall feedback - It didn't try to predict an outcome — no percentage, no "likely approval," just the reading itself. That took some adjustment (I wanted a number), but it's consistent with everything else Merito says about not doing probability estimates The thing I'd tell someone before they run it: don't do it as your very first step. Go in with at least a full draft, not scattered evidence — the commentary is much more useful once there's an actual structure for it to react to.