Evidence of speaking a language relevant to my field's international standing

My work involves genuine international collaboration, and multilingual capability was a real, relevant part of my professional profile — not a standalone criterion, but something I thought carefully about how to weave into my broader narrative of international standing and recognition. I didn't try to make language ability its own piece of evidence, since it isn't what any of the ten criteria are actually asking about — but I did use it as supporting context within my leading-role and original-contributions narratives, where my ability to work across international teams and publications in more than one language context was genuinely part of what made my specific contributions possible and significant. The lesson: not every genuine professional strength needs to map onto a specific criterion as standalone evidence — some things work better as supporting context woven into the narrative around evidence that does map onto a specific criterion, rather than forced into being their own separate exhibit.